Re: missing toast table for pg_policy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
Date
Msg-id CAJVSVGXMPzbpoNnBmq5mUDxYcTMVOyuSTAdiTf5XAfB2EfR5tA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing toast table for pg_policy  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/17/18, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> [... digging ...]
> This comes from get_rel_infos where large objects are treated as user
> data.  Rather than the comment you added, I would rather do the
> following:
> "Large object catalogs and toast tables are mutually exclusive and large
> object data is handled as user data by pg_upgrade, which would cause
> failures."

Sounds good to me.

-John Naylor


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" testpending solution of its timing is (fwd)