On Sat, 6 Jun 2026 at 03:35, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2026, at 23:05, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 12:57:56AM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote: >> Thoughts? Does this look like the right approach, or is there a >> reason to keep refint around? > > +1. Do we need an appendix-obsolete entry for the docs?
Seems like a reasonable thing to add. Once merged, we should probably add (and backpatch) a mention to the docs that the functionality will be removed in v20.
As you suggested, here's the back-branch doc change noting that refint will be removed in v20, pointing users to the built-in foreign key functionality.
I extended the existing paragraph (following the xml2/intagg deprecation style) rather than adding a separate note. Intended for back-patch to all supported branches (13-19).
