On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 2:53 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> Note choice of shell command name: though all the other programs in
> src/bin/scripts do not use the "pg_" prefix, this one does; we thought
> it made no sense to follow the old programs as precedent because there
> seems to be a lament for the lack of pg_ prefix in those, and we only
> keep what they are because of their long history. This one has no
> history.
>
> Still on pg_repackdb, the implementation here is to install a symlink
> called pg_repackdb which points to vacuumdb, and make the program behave
> differently when called in this way. The amount of additional code for
> this is relatively small, so I think this is a worthy technique --
> assuming it works. If it doesn't, Antonin proposed a separate binary
> that just calls some functions from vacuumdb. Or maybe we could have a
> common source file that both utilities call.
>
What's the plan for clusterdb? It seems like we'd ideally create a
stand alone pg_repackdb which replaces clusterdb and also allows us to
remove the FULL options from vacuumdb.
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
