Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: is pg_log_standby_snapshot() really needed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: is pg_log_standby_snapshot() really needed?
Date
Msg-id CAJKUy5hTQd4ZeRFr5ruNtXgJsfS+_8KtJLJKPSwhPKrw6PwpfQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: is pg_log_standby_snapshot() really needed?  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:12 AM Drouvot, Bertrand
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> a no-activity system at the time the logical replication slot is being created.
> Means at the time the system is "non active" it may be possible that the checkpoint
> would still have a lot to do.
>

ok, this doesn't deserve that much attention anyway...
It doesn't seem to do any harm, so I'm not spending more time on it

--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: YANG Xudong
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Use COPY for populating all pgbench tables