On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> http://pgolub.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/backward-compatibility-never-heard-of-it
>>
>> If we had stable system views for all database objects (stable as in we
>> just append to them), then refactoring our system tables wouldn't break
>> things for our users. Just sayin'.
>
> This has been discussed before, and I'm still not buying it. I mean,
> suppose you wrote code that depended on anything stated in a
> constraint always being true. Then we added deferrable constraints.
> Oops. But would you rather NOT have that feature? Appending columns
> doesn't help in that case.
>
also the incompatibility in the case of tablespaces was a "good" one...
i saw cases where the link was manually moved to another place... and
don't ask, don't know why they do this...
so something reading the spclocation would have been misleading
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
