Hi,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 7:53 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the following Andrey's comment regarding the isolation
> test from [1] and Andres's comment from [2] are pending. I'm changing
> the commitfest entry to Waiting on Author, please provide an updated
> patch and update it to Needs review.
Thanks for reading it.
I saw [2] and introduced a possible solution in my last letter. In
short : we can have a GUC variable that will permit superuser to drop
temp tables of other sessions. Thus, we have a single location in code
that will check whether we can perform operations with other temp
tables. As far as I understand, this is exactly what Andres wrote
about.
Also, it is difficult for me to express my opinion on [1] at the
moment. I can say for sure that the tests will change when we agree on
the behavior of the code. Therefore, I suggest postponing the
resolution of this issue.
> I suggest adding a GUC that will allow superuser to do this
Waiting for your feedback on this issue :)
--
Best regards,
Daniil Davydov
