Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TPqVtNVB+dk=uRMrHx+t-e+JRprdBfpd6s2TeLw+QWTew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi John,

By looking at timestamptz_bin() implementation I don't see why it
should be STABLE. Its return value depends only on the input values.
It doesn't look at the session parameters. timestamptz_in() and
timestamptz_out() are STABLE, that's true, but this is no concern of
timestamptz_bin().

Am I missing something?

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel Inserts (WAS: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks..)
Next
From: Yugo NAGATA
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix around conn_duration in pgbench