Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TNyAzjCZ=X-ncBEBApQX5yFzBjOa5B_w0LgcLPJN8gqmQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Michael,

Thanks for your feedback.

> +       * The order of PushActiveSnapshot() and SPI_connect() is not really
> +       * important.
>
> FWIW, looking at the patch, I don't think that this is particularly
> useful.

Fair enough, here is the corrected patch.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yugo NAGATA
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - adding pl/pgsql versions of tests
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query