Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TMhOvYpFpP52CfR0cjt2U9Y7PmGBtT2ormvZd1ULQZRNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10
List pgsql-hackers
Hi again,

> Just a quick question - is there a reason for changing the subject of
> the emails?
>
> Not all email clients handle this well, e.g. Google Mail considers
> this being 10 separate threads. The CF application and/or
> pgsql-hackers@ archive also don't recognise this as a continuation of
> the original thread. So all the discussions in -v8, -v9, -v9 ets
> threads get lost.
>
> May I suggest using a single thread?

OK, the part about the archive is wrong - I scrolled right to the end
of the thread, didn't notice v10 patch above and assumed it was lost.
Sorry for the confusion. However, the part about various email clients
is accurate.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension