Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From John Melesky
Subject Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
Date
Msg-id CAJ1GNCrqPY+mkfxAemPW+vx-hiC2pQNFJTTyfsx0bNZaid1EBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
I just learned that NFS does not use a file system cache on the client side.

That's ... incorrect. NFS is cache-capable. NFSv3 (I think? It may have been v2) started sending metadata on file operations that was intended to allow for client-side caches. NFSv4 added all sorts of stateful behavior which allows for much more aggressive caching.

Where did you read that you could not use caching with NFS?



--
John Melesky | Sr Database Administrator
503.284.7581 x204 | john.melesky@rentrak.com
RENTRAK | www.rentrak.com | NASDAQ: RENT

Notice: This message is confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above. If you have received this message in error,
or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the
sender and delete this message.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Shaun Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner doesn't take indexes into account
Next
From: Grzegorz Olszewski
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner doesn't take indexes into account