Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Matthias Apitz
Subject Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature
Date
Msg-id CAHzebO_N_WTWoGUsJcUaL6ukGadBEGOzwb-gbFnG=gRhmcrKxg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Responses Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature
Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature
List pgsql-bugs

Hi Stefan,

>
> grep ^DKIM mutt.mail
> DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org <http://
> smtp1.osuosl.org> C3A51819CC
> DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org <http://
> smtp3.osuosl.org> 5EB3A605E8
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;


not sure what you are try to tell us here - what is relevant is whether
the signature (if there is one) still validates and whether those lists
actually maintain List-* headers.

 

The mail I sent to the mutt-users mailing list contains what my provider adds as DKIM-signature:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unixarea.de
        ; s=blu3434000; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
        Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Cc:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
        List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=mUXCo4CB5VS0jsNsC2LeR8NOxLomD73G556GgsVmluA=; b=evptchc8isl0uD+RpFR+iPUP1z
        Fsx3N3+Hy1JPLQlNuGuHzKZA460Lgd/X+ZZQfp/LQVvcVVWfvMPXOOoNz9ANhTJPCfhAtfu0zit2a
        Xozgq0bH66Ig2PNNayGDoz+BOocDLTqT87Ue9O+OOYp5VXrV2r3xFdwPMI5rmSklhECwQiMMgpfb2
        Hnp1yOfjq5W9JdHjYCbMPFWCR+4BCyfPzUCKRJDN/txoUMTHr73Ip0S95QAhw1cT++2zGHeIv9Sdv
        3G+bZxy/UpIRg0WMmD6P+04gNjxGBWlOu8YukSX/g3k1sYiBpnbKnh5NdWI/ZPpS5S+WQAqbzteWS
        dhKhQmVw==;

and what is then delivered by the server of mutt.org is:

From mutt-users-bounces@mutt.org Sat Feb 22 13:06:32 2025
Return-Path: <mutt-users-bounces@mutt.org>
Delivered-To: w51246_0-guru@mb-13.1blu.de
Received: from ms-10.1blu.de ([172.16.180.5])
by mb-13.1blu.de with LMTP
id qFnPOMi9uWcneDoA2HEZdA
(envelope-from <mutt-users-bounces@mutt.org>)
for <w51246_0-guru@mb-13.1blu.de>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:32 +0100
Received: from [140.211.166.138] (helo=smtp1.osuosl.org)
by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.95)
(envelope-from <mutt-users-bounces@mutt.org>)
id 1tloHA-007Lt2-G5
for guru@unixarea.de;
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:32 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22D381A99;
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id tw30mst0o_g3; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=mutt-users-bounces@mutt.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org C3A51819CC
Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A51819CC;
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Delivered-To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79403D92
 for <mutt-users@mutt.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F5960670
 for <mutt-users@mutt.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id V8r3TyVZo1ko for <mutt-users@mutt.org>;
 Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=178.254.4.101;
 helo=ms-10.1blu.de; envelope-from=guru@unixarea.de; receiver=<UNKNOWN>
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp3.osuosl.org 5EB3A605E8
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5EB3A605E8
Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB3A605E8
 for <mutt-users@mutt.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:06:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [62.216.207.183] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de)
 by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <guru@unixarea.de>) id 1tloGu-007LCE-Uk
 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:17 +0100
Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-1400094 [127.0.0.1])
 by localhost.unixarea.de (8.17.1/8.14.9) with ESMTP id 51MC6GFG003949
 for <mutt-users@mutt.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:16 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de)
Received: (from guru@localhost)
 by localhost.my.domain (8.17.1/8.14.9/Submit) id 51MC6GLH003948
 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:16 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de)
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to
 guru@unixarea.de using -f
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:16 +0100
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: DKIM signature rejected
Message-ID: <Z7m9uGjDYsCWdHtS@c720-1400094>
Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org
References: <Z7b6/ObsQG8OZOPO@pureos> <AEi2z70BWrXPL2R8@aceecat.org>
 <Z7dhM3q7jskyCxPv@c720-1400094> <0kLY0pByvZWAaOff@aceecat.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <0kLY0pByvZWAaOff@aceecat.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT r1400094 (amd64)
X-message-flag: Mails in HTML will not be read! Please, only plain text.
X-Con-Id: 51246
X-Con-U: 0-guru
X-Originating-IP: 62.216.207.183
X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt;
 c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unixarea.de
 ; s=blu3434000; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 MIME-Version:References:Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Cc:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=P0GNuJT8+PqDMtQ3yPxl7iG7yOg5kBSJK0qy2eUD1OA=; b=INTn3Hn+OfMu9af5aja77QeUIt
 HPBI0HbqSQJD6ubWyMQ+HUcBfLnzCwK+AxzG7VVZ1+s+/WPRW1hHSWMpxW3Zmvsvi6jeENJyWKx6B
 UXM3l4/38I3zsttiFBwkhixQphmBxlddGhxl0CG5mp/7q/3SQRRZozNw+0FWymaqMrUlwXC6u9KRO
 Y2TLajF5Og9Wuj5OCkqLaZdhSBM/SvZlPDpFswxf8xiuF9uEbVc4WQr+lPSEzJ5FWs6uBCo841rht
 jVFH2/4r/JBxVCVJyz+p8p2QFaaeFGRNppmNwUx99FxErUo2n6VLgEWW7ESCoJiyP+NqM5VXwJdkH
 HGroZ40A==;
X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=unixarea.de
X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
 unprotected) header.d=unixarea.de header.i=@unixarea.de header.a=rsa-sha256
 header.s=blu3434000 header.b=INTn3Hn+
X-BeenThere: mutt-users@mutt.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: <mutt-users.mutt.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.mutt.org/mailman/options/mutt-users>,
 <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.mutt.org/mailman/listinfo/mutt-users>,
 <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
Errors-To: mutt-users-bounces@mutt.org
X-Envelope-To: @
Status: RO
Content-Length: 4445
Lines: 118

El día viernes, febrero 21, 2025 a las 01:21:02p. m. -0800, googly.negotiator862@aceecat.org escribió:
...

Why postgresql.org can not do the same?

Matthias
 

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature