Hi Bertrand-san, Michael-san,
Thanks for the additional review!
> Looking closer, I'm not sure that in:
>
> - lock table
> + lock table. See <xref linkend="locking-tables-fast-path"/> for
> + details.
>
> the "for details" is needed. Looking at the pg_locks table, it looks like
> "(See xxxx)" would be more consistent.
Fixed.
> I am wondering if the paragraph in view-pg-locks could be
> improved and/or shortened with what you are proposing here, even if
> most of it points to the inconsistencies one could get when querying
> pg_locks due to the volatile nature of fast-path locks... At least a
> link on the pg_locks page pointing to this new section could be
> something to consider.
Thanks for the detailed thought. I looked at that paragraph. I was
hoping to fold the two together, but the content did not seem to
overlap, so I limited the change to adding a link as you suggested.
v4 attached.
Regards,
Tatsuya Kawata
