Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0zkFWqmg11d+wgT=c=VPjzQC747bJUtxwX4-OKam=xvJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?  (Bráulio Bhavamitra <brauliobo@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra <brauliobo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm finally having performance issues with PostgreSQL when doing big
> analytics queries over almost the entire database of more than 100gb of
> data.
>
> And what I keep reading all over the web is many databases switching to
> columnar store (RedShift, Cassandra, cstore_fdw, etc) and having great
> performance on queries in general and giant boosts with big analytics
> queries.
>
> I wonder if there is any plans to move postgresql entirely to a columnar
> store (or at least make it an option), maybe for version 10?
>
> The current extensions are rather limited (types support for example) and
> require quite some configuration and data migration to work, besides they
> don't work in services like AWS RDS.

Column stores are better at one case (selecting a few columns from a
very wide table) and worse at just about every other case.  Also,
beware database benchmarks -- as they say, there is no free lunch
There is a reason why databases store things in rows.

Analytics in traditional postgres tables is definitely possible, but
you have to be smart.

merlin


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: raghu vineel
Date:
Subject: Fwd: Process scheduling in postgres
Next
From: Guyren Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?