Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0z6s6gWVYPCuRvNc633+EyG+Y2x_SDp=HhdObNe-U1NEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet?  Can we make a decision?
> > >
> > > Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
> > > I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
> > > AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax).  But we gotta pick something.
> >
> > If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
> > light vote for MATERIALIZED.  It reads easier, seems more grammatically
> > correct, and uses an existing word.
>
> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql

Seconded!

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: INSTALL file
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment