weird interaction between asynchronous queries and pg_sleep - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject weird interaction between asynchronous queries and pg_sleep
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0y_NxPF0sdp56uZWe6e5GnQq7PwyN3GmKEYqswKh-p_mg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: weird interaction between asynchronous queries and pg_sleep  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Consider the following snippet

create table data as select generate_series(1,1000000) s;

do $d$
begin
  PERFORM * FROM dblink_connect('test','');

  PERFORM * from dblink_send_query('test', 'SELECT * FROM data');

  LOOP
    if dblink_is_busy('test') = 0
    THEN
      PERFORM * FROM dblink_get_result('test') AS R(V int);
      PERFORM * FROM dblink_get_result('test') AS R(V int);
      RETURN;
    END IF;

    PERFORM pg_sleep(.001);
  END LOOP;

  PERFORM * FROM dblink_disconnect('test');
END;
$d$;

What's interesting here is that, when I vary the sleep parameter, I get:
0: .4 seconds (per top, this is busywait), same as running synchronous.
0.000001: 1.4 seconds
0.001: 2.4 seconds
0.01: 10.6 seconds
0.1: does not terminate

This effect is only noticeable when the remote query is returning
volumes of data.  My question is, is there any way to sleep loop
client side without giving up 3x performance penalty?  Why is that
that when more local sleep queries are executed, performance improves?

merlin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: test runner (was Re: SQL-standard function body)
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM (DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING on)