On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> wrote:
> On 09-12-2013 13:12, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> This is pretty neat. Couple minor questions:
>> *) Aren't you *en*coding data into json, not the other way around (decoding?)
>>
> Yes. The 'decoding' came from the functionality (logical decoding) and
> because the POC plugin is named 'test_decoding'. I also think that
> 'json_decoding' doesn't say much about the module purpose. I confess
> that I don't like the name but can't come up with a good name. Maybe
> 'wal2json' or 'logrep2json'? Could you suggest something?
I'm partial to wal2json actually.
merlin
