Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0y8=njVe=oCObu4M83gEaQV4PDfQjPAXgdUZyPd-f+QLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 6/11/13 12:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>> Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns
>> made IMNSHO are specious.
>
> That's nice, but we have this process for validating whether features go in
> or not that relies on review instead of opinions.

Sure: I phrased that badly by 'go in' I meant 'go through the review
process', not commit out of hand.

merlin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Atri Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.4 CF1 Starts Saturday: need patches, reviewers, asst. CFM
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON and unicode surrogate pairs