Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0xSJR=r4savNfMcpzxBh9ZzgMc4aZtD4DxramZiexkYSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4  ("Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>)
Responses Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran
<tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> wrote:
>
> 9.3.5:
>         0.035940        END;
>
>
> 9.4beta2:
>         0.957854        END;


time being spent on 'END' is definitely suggesting i/o related issues.
This is making me very skeptical that postgres is the source of the
problem.   I also thing synchronous_commit is not set properly on the
new instance (or possibly there is a bug or some such).  Can you
verify via:

select * from pg_settings where name = 'synchronous_commit';

on both servers?

What is iowait?  For pci-e SSD, these drives don't seem very fast...

merlin


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran"
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4