On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any experiences they can share when
> designing the time dimension for a star schema and the like. I'm
> curious about how well it would work to use a timestamp for the
> attribute key, as opposed to a surrogate key, and populating the time
> dimension with triggers on insert to the fact tables. This is
> something that would have data streaming in (as oppose to bulk
> loading) and I think we want time granularity to the minute.
>
> A simplified example:
>
> -- Time dimension
> CREATE TABLE time (
> datetime TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL,
> day_of_week SMALLINT NOT NULL
> );
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON time (datetime);
>
> -- Fact
> CREATE TABLE fact(
> datetime TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL,
> FOREIGN KEY (datetime) REFERENCES time(datetime)
> );
>
> -- Function to populate the time dimension
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION decompose_timestamp() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
> BEGIN
> NEW.datetime = date_trunc('minutes', NEW.datetime);
> INSERT INTO time (datetime, day_of_week)
> VALUES (NEW.datetime, date_part('dow', NEW.datetime));
> RETURN NEW;
> EXCEPTION
> WHEN unique_violation THEN
> -- Do nothing if the timestamp already exists in the dimension table.
> RETURN new;
> END; $$
> LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
Failure to inline the date/time in dimension tables a terrible
practice IMO. You add a lookup and an expensive subtransaction to
each insert. When querying the fact table you tack on a join for
every query that does not need to be there (for no benefit I can see).
merlin
