Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0wFFq0XKtMwRmuueWyjqFhyrAT4SfxoTv1idZ5nN1GwKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I propose that we implement and document this as
>> WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZE { ON | OFF } ] ( query )

> I hate to bikeshed here, but I think it's better english using that
> style of syntax to say,
>  WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZATION { ON | OFF } ] ( query )

Hm.  Doesn't really seem to fit with our style for options elsewhere;
for instance, EXPLAIN's options are things like ANALYZE ON/OFF and
VERBOSE ON/OFF, not ANALYSIS and VERBOSITY.

                        regards, tom lane

Yep...I'll concede the point.

merlin  

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonpath
Next
From: "Ideriha, Takeshi"
Date:
Subject: RE: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries