Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Pvb1WpQr3GxSRkjca6gAGa=4+Qu1NexkkPaQmNFjMKovQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 11:09 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 23.11.22 09:36, Peter Smith wrote:
> > PSA new patches. Now there are 6 of them. If some of the earlier
> > patches are agreeable can those ones please be committed? (because I
> > think this patch may be susceptible to needing a big rebase if
> > anything in those tables changes).
>
> I have committed
>
> v6-0001-Re-order-sections-of-28.4.-Progress-Reporting.patch
> v6-0003-Re-order-Table-28.12-Wait-Events-of-type-LWLock.patch
> v6-0004-Re-order-Table-28.35-Per-Backend-Statistics-Funct.patch
>
> which seemed to have clear consensus.
>
> v6-0002-Re-order-Table-28.2-Collected-Statistics-Views.patch
>
> This one also seems ok, need a bit more time to look it over.
>
> v6-0005-Cleanup-view-name-hyperlinks-for-Tables-28.1-and-.patch
> v6-0006-Remove-all-stats-views-from-the-ToC-of-28.2.patch
>
> I wasn't sure yet whether these had been reviewed yet, sine they were
> late additions to the patch series.

Thank you for pushing those ones.

PSA the remaining patches re-posted so cfbot can keep working

v6-0002 --> v7-0001
v6-0005 -> v7-0002
v6-0006 -> v7-0003

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?