Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views.
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PvCD7E9Y7xF+9uyGafx0t+jDjawxYi4eq8pOQxFmS7J8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views.  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [PGDOCS] Inconsistent linkends to "monitoring" views.
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:30 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:11:15PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly
> > inconsistent from all the others.
>
> -   <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription">
> +   <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription-view">
>
> Is that really worth bothering for the internal link references?

I preferred 100% consistency instead of 95% consistency. YMMV.

> This can create extra backpatching conflicts.

Couldn't the same be said for every patch that fixes a comment typo?
This is like a link typo, so what's the difference?

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances