Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Pv52ReaYQpMgipzF4tD4AXD-ypQP4CJ8VbzkqMbZaz2EA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:35 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:59:45PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > I noticed the pg_sequences system-view DOCS page [1] has a note about
> > the 'last_value' field. But the note is not within the row for that
> > field. Indeed, it is not even within the table.
> >
> > Is it deliberate? Apparently, this changed in commit 3cb2f13 [2], so
> > CC-ing author Nathan.
>
> Yes, this was intentional.  I felt this was too much information to squeeze
> into the table, and so I followed the example of pg_user_mappings [0] and
> placed it below.
>
> [0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/view-pg-user-mappings.html
>

OK. Thanks for the explanation.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Atkinson
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP CONSTRAINT, printing a notice and/or skipping when no action is taken
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip