Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PuwB1_z2nh6QYF6mE22a=93s6pkL87t097NDZ3MCzJa+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
FYI - I confirmed that all of my proposed changes have already been
addressed by Sawada-San's commit [1], so now there is nothing to do
for this thread.

The End.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bryan Green
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow complex data for GUC extra.
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix incorrect buffer lock description in pg_visibility comment