Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PuTH35hTKaP_+wuUepAbuWC2YLizG1aqxjvJP_fPBFFVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+
List pgsql-hackers
> >
> > PSA  v3 patches.
> >
> > v3-0001 - Fixed the TABLE describe footer titles as suggested.
> > - "Included in publications:"
> > - "Excluded from publications:"
> >
> > v3-0002 - Made similar footer title changes for SEQUENCE describe
> >
> > v3-0003 - Made similar footer title changes for SHCEMA describe. In
> > passing, I found that this \dn describe output was not even being
> > tested, so I added the missing regression test.
>
> I'm not sure separate patches are necessary for this change; it might
> be better to merge them into a single patch. Other than that, the
> changes look good.
>

I separated them because only the changes to TABLE \d had previously
been discussed.

If everyone thinks all changes are good, then I can combine them into one patch.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ayush Tiwari
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postmaster: fix stale PM_STARTUP comment
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: DOCS - CREATE PUBLICATION ... EXCEPT missing details on ONLY