DOCS: Missing tags for some SEQUENCE fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject DOCS: Missing tags for some SEQUENCE fields
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PtpDMUE3Kd1p=1ff9pw2HMbgQCpowE_0Hd6gs5v2pKfQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: DOCS: Missing tags for some SEQUENCE fields
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found
[1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been
used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]).

PSA patch v1 to address these.

======
[1] Searched all docs for 'is_called' and for 'last_value'
[2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/980a855c5c2e21e964a739694e24004f72e03fdf

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename sync_error_count to tbl_sync_error_count in subscription statistics