Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Pt2nj5hT66okV=fkzuBLXJY+Kw5p=fBW-aYfzWM1q2p4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:23 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2.
> > > @@ -98,11 +102,16 @@
> > >  #include "miscadmin.h"
> > >  #include "parser/parse_relation.h"
> > >  #include "pgstat.h"
> > > +#include "postmaster/interrupt.h"
> > >  #include "replication/logicallauncher.h"
> > >  #include "replication/logicalrelation.h"
> > > +#include "replication/logicalworker.h"
> > >  #include "replication/walreceiver.h"
> > >  #include "replication/worker_internal.h"
> > > +#include "replication/slot.h"
> > >
> > > I don't think the above includes are required. They seem to the
> > > remnant of the previous approach.
> > >
> >
> > OK. Fixed in the latest patch [v19].
> >
>
> You seem to forgot removing #include "replication/slot.h". Check, if
> it is not required then remove that as well.
>

Fixed in the latest patch [v20].

----
[v20] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuNwSujoL_dwa%3DTtozJ_vF%3DCnJxjgQTCmNBkazd8J1m-A%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?