Some review comments for v22-0003.
======
1.
It looks like none of my previous v20-0003 review comments [1] have
been addressed. Maybe accidentally overlooked?
======
2.
+ <caution>
+ <para>
+ The internal conflict logging table is strictly tied to
the lifecycle of the
+ subscription or the
<literal>conflict_log_destination</literal> setting. If
+ the subscription is dropped, or if the destination is changed to
+ <literal>log</literal>, the table and all its recorded
conflict data are
+ <emphasis>permanently deleted</emphasis>. To perform a
post-mortem analysis
+ after removing a subscription, users must manually back up
or rename the
+ conflict table before the deletion occurs.
+ </para>
+ </caution>
2a.
Let's consistently call this the "Conflict log table", same as
everywhere else, not "logging table".
~
2b.
This is only a caution for the CLT, so I felt it's better to put this
in the scope of the 'table' param value.
~~~
3.
+ analysis of conflicts. This table is automatically
dropped when the
+ subscription is removed.
If you move the <caution> to this scope, as suggested above in #2b,
then you can remove the sentence "This table is automatically dropped
when the subscription is removed", because that is duplicate
information you already wrote in the caution.
======
[1] v20 docs review -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuzB4gNYvqX9hb28KE0RK_xhU%2B2-%3DwUfL5OEVUCi92Hqw%40mail.gmail.com
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
