Re: pg_stat_replication docs incomplete for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: pg_stat_replication docs incomplete for logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PsTuCDA+gL-yCcHzGb4WyHKXj14Nqw4irgxtQR8EDxkkQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_stat_replication docs incomplete for logical replication  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 4:26 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 4:52 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The latest patch LGTM regarding the content.
> >
> > But, there were some trivial issues.
> >
> > ======
> >
> > 1.
> > The patch name did not change. The 2nd patch was still called 0001?
> >
> > ~~~
> >
> > 2.
> > +  <para>
> > +    The <structname>pg_stat_replication</structname> view will contain one row
> > +    per WAL sender process, showing statistics about replication to that
> > ... etc.
> >
> > Paragraph text is sometimes indented 1 space too many in the SGML file.
> > AFAIK, text normally is aligned with the "p" of <para>.
> >
>
> Thanks for your feedback. The attached patch addresses the alignment
> issue and has been tagged as v3. The two preceding patches, though
> untagged, can be considered v1 and v2 respectively.
>
> Please have a look and let me know for any further changes.
>

Patch v3 LGTM.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Global temporary tables
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve UNION's output rowcount estimate