On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 2:35 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 4:16 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 5:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 9:04 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A documentation gap was identified [1] regarding the new publication
> > > > FOR ALL TABLES EXCEPT behaviour. e.g. what happens if an excluded
> > > > table is renamed or moved?
> > > >
> > > > This patch addresses that gap.
> > > >
> > > > Note that the patch uses different text from what was previously
> > > > suggested because, when I checked with AI, it proposed this much
> > > > simpler wording.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I find the previous wording proposed by me better as it has some
> > > explanation especially: "Once a table is excluded, the exclusion
> > > applies to that table itself, regardless of its name or schema", So
> > > ideally, we can keep the wording proposed or adjust with some
> > > explanation using the above part.
> > >
> >
> > PSA patch v2.
> >
>
> Pushed.
>
Thanks for pushing.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
