Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Peter Smith |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | CAHut+Ps8GEcsrejO1YUmb138a6XunV5uPmvppJ+WKRaFRhJnqw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Responses |
Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 8:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 2:40 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 11:09 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I want to discuss the create-publication case, which currently gives > > this warning: > > > > postgres=# create publication pub1 for all tables; > > WARNING: logical decoding should be allowed to publish logical changes > > HINT: Before creating subscriptions, set "wal_level" >= "logical" or > > create a logical replication slot when "wal_level" = "replica". > > CREATE PUBLICATION > > > > But is this warning really necessary during publication creation? > > > > On HEAD, the WARNING/HINT is as follows for the above case: > WARNING: "wal_level" is insufficient to publish logical changes > HINT: Set "wal_level" to "logical" before creating subscriptions. > > Shouldn't we simply change the HINT to "Set "wal_level" to "logical" > or create a logical replication slot before creating subscriptions."? > I had suggested in a previous review [1-#6b] that perhaps this HINT wording is overkill now. e.g. I felt now maybe it only needs to say. HINT: Set "wal_level" >= "replica". E.g. I thought there is no need to mention "create a logical slot before creating subscriptions", because creating a typical subscription (which has a slot) is doing that anyway, so the publisher's effective_wal_level will increase on the fly, without the user needing to do anything. At least, that is what I observed with the experiment shown below: Indeed, doesn't it mean this entire WARNING is redundant now? e.g. When wal_level is "minimal", I thought the CREATE PUBLICATION command would be impossible in the first place. And for wal_level = "replica" or "logcial", it just works without the user doing anything. ////////// EXPERIMENT -- Try creating a subscription that will automatically bump up the effective_wal_level on the Publisher. ========== On Publisher ========== test_pub=# show wal_level; show effective_wal_level; wal_level ----------- replica (1 row) effective_wal_level --------------------- replica (1 row) test_pub=# create publication mypub for all tables; WARNING: logical decoding must be enabled to publish logical changes HINT: Before creating subscriptions, set "wal_level" >= "logical" or create a logical replication slot when "wal_level" = "replica". CREATE PUBLICATION ========== On Subscriber: ========== test_sub=# show wal_level; show effective_wal_level; wal_level ----------- replica (1 row) effective_wal_level --------------------- replica (1 row) test_sub=# create subscription mysub connection 'dbname=test_pub' publication mypub; NOTICE: created replication slot "mysub" on publisher CREATE SUBSCRIPTION test_sub=# 2025-10-23 13:56:08.260 AEDT [14453] LOG: logical replication apply worker for subscription "mysub" has started 2025-10-23 13:56:08.278 AEDT [14455] LOG: logical replication table synchronization worker for subscription "mysub", table "t1" has started 2025-10-23 13:56:08.391 AEDT [14455] LOG: logical replication table synchronization worker for subscription "mysub", table "t1" has finished ========== Now, back on the Publisher: ========== test_pub=# show wal_level; show effective_wal_level; wal_level ----------- replica (1 row) effective_wal_level --------------------- logical (1 row) ====== [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPtB4zZrMKm_vUd-JO29Uq2479unx1KR%3DhGu%3DsQxfSVXJg%40mail.gmail.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
pgsql-hackers by date: