On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 5:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 03:32:24PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> > I fed the logical replication online documentation into my favourite
> > AI tool to help me come up with the following patch that fixes many
> > minor issues (e.g., spelling, grammar, inconsistencies, vagueness,
> > etc.).
>
> It is a mixed bag of changes. Some of the suggestions are correct
> grammar fixes, some make things somewhat worse, some are irrelevant
> (like the s/won't/will not/ or the s/please//).
>
> - When logical replication of a table typically starts, PostgreSQL takes
> - a snapshot of the table's data on the publisher database and copies it
> + Logical replication of a table typically starts by PostgreSQL taking
> + a snapshot of the table's data on the publisher database and copying it
> to the subscriber. Once complete, changes on the publisher since the
>
> This new sentence makes less sense here. And there's nothing bad with
> the original.
>
> Some of these mistakes are older than HEAD, and are user-visible, so
> backpatched the most relevant ones.
>
> Thanks.
Hi Michael,
Thanks for pushing!
(My opinion differs about some of the rejected ones, but I am not
going to debate about them.)
======
Kind Regards
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
