Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Willy-Bas Loos
Subject Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Date
Msg-id CAHnozTg0VRHXUwa8diyCbh3Mc0n4Hr5ap3UNJab+DLNs2yN7VA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?  (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
thanks!
i also see that it's available from apt.postgresql.org, including lots of postgres versions!

WBL



On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:25:15PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> I want to upgrade from londiste2 to londiste3.
> Skytools 2 has a -modules- package.
> We're using postgres 8.4 at the moment, so we use the package
> skytools-modules-8.4.
>
> Now i'm looking at londiste3 in Debian experimental, but there are no
> 'modules' packages. Don't i need one anymore?
> (hope this is not off-topic for the list)

It's renamed to postgresql-X.Y-pgq3.

--
marko




--
"Quality comes from focus and clarity of purpose" -- Mark Shuttleworth

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE using 3 medium-sized tables causes runaway hash table and fills disk