Re: PostgreSQL suitable? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vincenzo Romano
Subject Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Date
Msg-id CAHjZ2x5XAahW7Rj+zW57Eeq9wb1-1C4=j72r+vob501B1WgW9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
List pgsql-general
I've not tested PG10. But it's not released for production yet!

Il 19 dic 2017 15:48, "Andreas Kretschmer" <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> ha scritto:


Am 19.12.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Kellner Thiemo:
Hi

We are developing a data warehouse of which the integration layer will start with over 100 TB of data. There are not many entities though we probably can partition and foremost we should use inheritance for the lab results. I just was wondering if PostgreSQL was able to cope with. In case it depends on the modelling kind, we have not yet decided between classic erd, anchor modelling and data vault.

Does someone have experience with such a set up?

Kind regards

Thiemo



depends at least on the data and the workload. pg10 contains better solutions for table-partitioning, up to 1000 (maybe more) child-tables arn't that problem.
We have customers in that range.


Regards, Andreas

--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?