On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 2:33 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Masahiko, > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:57 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 2:59 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:31 PM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM >> > <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Please find attached patch that adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while scanning the buffers in pg_buffercache_pages. I checked other functions in the module and this check already exists in pg_buffercache_numa_pages. >> > >> > Thank you for the patch! >> > >> > I think the patch is reasonable and it looks good to me. I'll push it >> > to master early next week, barring objections. >> >> After reviewing this patch more, I'm leaning toward to backpatch this >> change. The patch adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to >> pg_buffercache_pages(), pg_buffercache_summary(), and >> pg_buffercache_usage_counts(), and the latter two functions were >> introduced in v16. Therefore, for v15 or older we can add CFI to only >> pg_buffercache_pages() and apply this patch to v16 or newer. Thoughts? > > > Thanks for reviewing the patch. Sounds good to me.
Could you provide patches also for back branches? or shall I?
Attached the patch for v15 and below. Please let me know if you need anything.
