FOR PORTION OF does not recompute GENERATED STORED columns that depend on the range column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
Subject FOR PORTION OF does not recompute GENERATED STORED columns that depend on the range column
Date
Msg-id CAHg+QDcd=t69gLf9yQexO07EJ2mx0Z70NFHo6h94X1EDA=hM0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Responses Re: FOR PORTION OF does not recompute GENERATED STORED columns that depend on the range column
List pgsql-hackers
Hi hackers,

It appears that this is a bug where UPDATE FOR ... PORTION OF fails to recompute GENERATED ALWAYS AS ... STORED columns whose expressions reference the range column being narrowed. Please find the repro below.

postgres=# CREATE TABLE t (id int, valid_at int4range NOT NULL, val int,
    range_len int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (upper(valid_at) - lower(valid_at)) STORED);
INSERT INTO t VALUES (1, '[1,100)', 10);
UPDATE t FOR PORTION OF valid_at FROM 30 TO 70 SET val = 99;
SELECT *, upper(valid_at) - lower(valid_at) AS expected FROM t ORDER BY valid_at;
CREATE TABLE
INSERT 0 1
UPDATE 1
 id | valid_at | val | range_len | expected
----+----------+-----+-----------+----------
  1 | [1,30)   |  10 |        29 |       29
  1 | [30,70)  |  99 |        99 |       40
  1 | [70,100) |  10 |        30 |       30
(3 rows)


The updated row [30,70) retains the stale range_len = 99 from the original [1,100) range. The leftover inserts are correct because CMD_INSERT unconditionally recomputes all generated columns. Virtual generated columns are not affected and are computed correctly because they're evaluated at read time from the actual stored valid_at value.

Further looking at the code it appears, In transformForPortionOfClause(), the range column is intentionally not added to perminfo->updatedCols. Since the range column is absent from updatedCols, any generated stored column whose expression depends solely on the range column (e.g., upper(valid_at) - lower(valid_at)) is skipped. Therefore, its expression is never prepared and never recomputed during the FPO update.

Attached a draft patch that has the test scenario and a fix to address this issue. In ExecInitGenerated, after retrieving updatedCols, the patch additionally checks whether the owning ModifyTableState contains an FPO clause. If it does, the attribute number (attno) of the range column is added to updatedCols.

Thanks,
Satya
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Next
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]