Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tender Wang
Subject Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
Date
Msg-id CAHewXN=7+738QPPdhxgKbHeQa_ahEbC7Aw+VoJpOxe1PZ5uVng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 于2025年7月20日周日 02:25写道:
Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> writes:
> Please take a look at the attached v3 patch.

This is of course not ever going to make any visible performance
difference.  Still, the code is arguably clearer like this, and
I added some comments in hopes of improving it some more.
Pushed.

                        regards, tom lane

Thanks for pushing.
--
Thanks,
Tender Wang

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_logical_slot_get_changes waits continously for a partial WAL record spanning across 2 pages
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication