HA Setup Review - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From akshay polji
Subject HA Setup Review
Date
Msg-id CAHecRenM5M9G3mmbE5srhUso0MFC-g6F5rVjwrXo_vZ7fvEt9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: HA Setup Review  (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Hello Team,

I am looking for some feedback on the HA Setup that we are finalizing for running our business critical workloads.

We are planning to follow this Setup,
https://www.pgpool.net/docs/42/en/html/example-cluster.html
 
  • Basically a 3 node PostgreSQL Cluster, running 3 processes i.e. PostgreSQL DB, PGPool and WatchDog. 
  • These 3 nodes will be distributed across 3 availability zones/data centers for resilience and use a synchronous replication between Primary and Stand-by. 
  • Synchronous option will be Any One, so that the DB availability is not impacted if 1 Stand-by is down for even planned outage i.e. Patching of DB or Virtual Machine. 

We see a lot of benefits of this setup in terms of availability and managing less infrastructure v/s setting up separate machines for PGPool. 

However, I wanted to know if there are any Cons/Downsides of this setup and any suggestion to improve this setup. 

Any views would be highly appreciated.

Thanks & Regards,
Akshay 
Attachment

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Priancka Chatz
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgbouncer connection timed out
Next
From: "alexander al (leiden)"
Date:
Subject: AWS RDS postgresql upgrade from 14 to 15