Re: [HACKERS] Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl startwithout --wait - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ryan Murphy
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl startwithout --wait
Date
Msg-id CAHeEsBeZnHVh-dSAuem4m7x8gFYoxajKkKLVTTtNV+RLz32AKw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl startwithout --wait  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl start without--wait  (Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Making --wait the default may or may not be sensible -- I'm not sure
-- but removing --no-wait is clearly a bad idea, and we shouldn't do
it.  The fact that the problems created by removing it might be
solvable doesn't mean that it's a good idea to create them in the
first place.



I agree with Robert - pg_ctl is no doubt used in all kinds of scripts that would then have to change.
It may make sense to have --wait be the default though - certainly less confusing to new users!

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl startwithout --wait
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warnings