Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ryan Murphy
Subject Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date
Msg-id CAHeEsBdpjgfTz1e0quLNm0a-c-X9sfvLC0b9YE2_NDaGtOvd0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I tested that with HEAD, but couldn't reproduce this problem.  Didn't you test that with HEAD?

Yeah, I know it's not an issue other people are having - I think it's something specific about how my environment / postgres build is set up.  In any case I knew that it wasn't caused by your patch.

Thanks,
Ryan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan