>> As far as I
>> can tell, the reason the main project requires patches was to change
>> the *process* as little as possible in the course of changing the VCS
>> plumbing.
>
> That's *a* reason, but not the only one. Other large considerations are
> that we consider that the act of submitting the patch to the mailing
> list is evidence of intent to license the code under the Postgres
> license, and further that this evidence is archived in the PG list
> archives.
That's an excellent point--thanks for the clarification.
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com
