Thanks Michael
Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> That seems kind of limited to me in scope. The executor is only one
> part of the system. I would have considered using an xact callback
> when a transaction is aborted if I were to do a patch like the one you
> are proposing, to know how many times a transaction is failing at a
> specific phase, because you should know the latest query_id in this
> case to be able to put a counter update in the correct slot (right?).
I will make a v5 patch with this approach. It should also address your
second comment about using `pg_sleep` in the test. I used this
approach because it sounds that it's the closest to a real timeout
issue in production, more like integration testing. I will try to
change that with the new patch.
__________
Benoit Tigeot
