Re: default values in inheritance hierarchies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Miroslav Šimulčík
Subject Re: default values in inheritance hierarchies
Date
Msg-id CAHRNM6_pAGoXPh_XV0B0GW0uJd8BMkBEJ+sS4HG3_tmSjLX1xQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to default values in inheritance hierarchies  (Miroslav Šimulčík <simulcik.miro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: default values in inheritance hierarchies  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry, I have accidentaly sent incomplet mail.

Here is the rest:

The following sequence of commands will end up with error, because of duplicate ID in table a2:

    insert into a2(data2, data) values(456, 'jkl');
    insert into a2(data2, data) values(789, 'mno');

Is there any way how to force UPDATE to use default value of ID column from table a2 when updating rows in this table, without using triggers?

Thank you

Best regards
Miroslav Simulcik  

2012/2/27 Miroslav Šimulčík <simulcik.miro@gmail.com>
Hi,

I have two tables defined for example like this:

    create table a1 (id serial primary key, data text);
    create table a2 (id serial primary key, data2 integer) inherits (a1);

The point is, that I want to have two tables with inheritance relation between them, but each with its own id column (overriden in child table).

Then I execute this sequence of commands:

    insert into a1(data) values('abc');
    insert into a2(data2, data) values(123, 'def');
    update a1 set id = default, data = 'ghi';

I need new IDs on each update, because I store old rows in another table to keep history of changes. Problem is that update uses values from sequence belonging to table a1 when updating rows in table a2.

So the content of tables after operations is:

select * from only a1;
 id | data
----+------
  2 | ghi

select * from a2;
 id | data | data2
----+------+-------
  3 | ghi  |   123

The following sequence of commands ends up wit 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Miroslav Šimulčík
Date:
Subject: default values in inheritance hierarchies
Next
From: Jan Lentfer
Date:
Subject: Re: swapcache-style cache?