Re: Using a single sequence for all tables - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Lewis
Subject Re: Using a single sequence for all tables
Date
Msg-id CAHOFxGq9OF4UOnHZYCvTgaZZGAjaUMewfCrGjNyz2XfdAA_xPw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using a single sequence for all tables  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Using a single sequence for all tables  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
List pgsql-general
If your processes somehow allow updates on the wrong table, then fix that.

If you run out of space in whatever value range you choose initially, the pain to upgrade to a type that allows larger values would seem to be very large.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Using a single sequence for all tables
Next
From: Amine Tengilimoglu
Date:
Subject: ERROR: unrecognized node type