2012/6/21 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote:
>> 2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>>>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is
>>>>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much
>>>>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions)
>>>>
>>>> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and
>>>> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final
>>>> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?
>>>
>>> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we
>>> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual
>>> release as 9.2.0...
>>
>>
>> May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other
>> versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working.
>
> That we can do - in fact, done.
It works fine here, thanks!
[]s
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: guedes@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
