Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHmLtDoa8R3SHk65LCeEvR4XkP=vcvDgt3-g9t71xbzWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-08-19 18:02:32 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > On 2014-08-18 14:38:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> >> - IDENTIFY_SYSTEM checks were incorrect (even in HEAD). The following
>> >> check was done but in 9.4 this command returns 4 fields:
>> >> (PQntuples(res) != 1 || PQnfields(res) < 3)
>> >
>> > Which is correct. We don't want to error out in the case where 3 columns
>> > are returned because that'd unnecessarily break compatibility with <
>> > 9.4. Previously that check was != 3...
>> >
>> > This isn't a bug.
>>
>> Okay, I understood why you didn't update those codes.
>>
>> Since we don't allow replication between different major versions,
>> it's better to apply this change at least into libpqwalreceiver.c. Thought?
>
> We'd discussed that we'd rather keep it consistent. It also results in a
> more explanatory error message lateron.

Hmm... okay, will revert the commit.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Next
From: Rahila Syed
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes