Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHRmS9ndxNU1bUR4rNtR9tNWbC0Veq6-b_fn0WExN+e=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 1/1/17 4:14 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> OK, so here's the patch, plus doc cleanup patch.
>
> I don't think this patch is likely to succeed if we throw in more ideas
> in every round.
>
> I think we have or are approaching agreement on moving recovery.conf
> into postgresql.conf, making the settings reloadable, and adding signal
> (formerly trigger) files to trigger recovery or standby.  I think that
> is a useful change, but it's already big enough and needs extensive
> reviewing and testing.

Agreed. It's better to focus on the "core" part of the patch firstly.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6