Is abort() still needed in WalSndShutdown()? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Is abort() still needed in WalSndShutdown()?
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHPX1yoixq+YB5rF4zL90TMmSEa3FpHURtqW3Jc5+=oSA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Is abort() still needed in WalSndShutdown()?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

While reviewing the patch [1], I found that WalSndShutdown() calls abort()
with the comment "keep the compiler quiet" just after proc_exit(0).

        static void
        WalSndShutdown(void)
        {
        /*
        * Reset whereToSendOutput to prevent ereport from attempting to send any
        * more messages to the standby.
        */
        if (whereToSendOutput == DestRemote)
        whereToSendOutput = DestNone;

        proc_exit(0);
        abort(); /* keep the compiler quiet */
        }

This may have been necessary in the past, but is it still required?
Other functions, such as CheckpointerMain(), simply call proc_exit(0)
without an abort(), which doesn't seem to cause compiler warnings.
That made me wonder whether the abort() in WalSndShutdown() is
still needed, or which compiler would actually warn if WalSndLoop()
does not end with an abort().

Thoughts?

[1] https://postgr.es/m/d062db6a-8040-41eb-b3c9-32c3af30ef2b@postgrespro.ru

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vitaly Davydov
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadlock detector fails to activate on a hot standby replica
Next
From: Soumya S Murali
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpointer write combining