Re: pg_stats_recovery view - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHGTs+nd_My1irEeiNmoFxpZ9ecmxyepzhbGMEZvi90Aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stats_recovery view  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 08:26, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> --On 15. Januar 2012 02:50:00 -0500 Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached is a patch thats implements a pg_stat_recovery view that
>>>>>> keeps counters about processed wal records. I just notice that it
>>>>>> still lacks documentation but i will add it during the week.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Before reviewing the patch, I'd like to know: what's the purpose of this view?
>>> It's only debug purpose? ISTM that most users don't care about this view at all.
>>>
>>
>> yeah! you're right. most users won't care about it... did i tell that
>> i added a track_recovery GUC so only users that wanted pay for it? i
>> probably did not tell that :D
>
> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment:
> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It
> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store
> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand?

Agreed. I think we should either.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server