On Sun, Mar 1, 2026 at 3:07 PM Tatsuya Kawata
<kawatatatsuya0913@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Fujii-san,
>
> Thank you for your review!
>
> > Would it be better to use "relations supporting SELECT" instead of "selectables"?
>
> Good point. I've updated the comment to use "relations supporting SELECT" for consistency.
>
> > As for the regression test, I agree with Kirill.
>
> In my earlier discussion with Kirill, I argued that tests should be kept since this patch implements a new feature.
> However, I now understand that the existing tests already cover the Query_for_list_of_selectables pattern,
> so a separate test for DELETE ... USING would be redundant. I've removed the test in the updated patch.
>
> I've prepared a v5 patch with the following changes:
> - Use "relations supporting SELECT" in the comment for consistency
> - Remove the regression test
>
> The updated v5 patch is attached.
Thanks for updating the patch! I've pushed it.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao